parkland or anything they can work with to have a pool to trap water. so we'll have to take houses. we're going to have to create pools to hold water for longer periods of time. and really one solution is taking homes by eminent domain, tearing them down and planting grass, so the water sex in instead of flows into the creek. this is really just ludicrous. this is over $300 million of probable cost between these two agencies for one creek! >> steve: it's crazy. here is what the epa says in their motion. epa's proceeding is in harmony with the broader purpose of the clean water act, clean, the operative word there, including congress' objectives of protecting the physical and biological integrity of water and reducing the water quality impacts. that sounds like something from the epa. the key is, this is nothing new. this was going on where water was running into that creek when george washington was still running around them parts. >> the creek is right near mount vernon and george washington was writing in his own diary about his inability to get across this creek because of high wate
